enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. The corporate exodus from China is gaining momentum ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/corporate-exodus-china...

    The share of companies that are moving operations out of China jumped to 69% in 2024 from 55% in 2022, a Bain survey said. The corporate exodus from China is gaining momentum, study says Skip to ...

  3. Foreign businesses want out of China. But breaking up ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/foreign-businesses-want-china...

    Multinational companies have more reasons than ever to get out of China — if they can. Foreign businesses want out of China. But breaking up may be tougher than ever

  4. Steve Madden just drastically changed its business to avoid ...

    www.aol.com/just-days-trump-victory-steve...

    So Madden may be the first American company to move production out of China because of Trump’s proposals – but it probably won’t be the last. And Americans shouldn’t expect all that ...

  5. Teradyne pulled $1 billion worth of manufacturing from China ...

    www.aol.com/news/teradyne-pulled-1-billion-worth...

    Teradyne, a supplier of semiconductor testing equipment, pulled manufacturing worth about $1 billion out of China last year, a Teradyne spokesperson said on Monday, after U.S. export regulations ...

  6. China Plus One - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Plus_One

    Some say that moving out of China now is not even practical. [16] The China Plus One strategy does give China its own benefits. China is able to maintain low-end manufacturing while also growing higher-value sectors. China Plus One strategy did not reduce the number of manufacturers, nor jobs in manufacturing.

  7. Go Out policy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_Out_policy

    Go Out policy (Chinese: 走出去战略; pinyin: Zǒuchūqù Zhànlüè) or the Going Global Strategy [1]: 6 is the People's Republic of China's current strategy to encourage its enterprises to invest overseas. The policy was announced as a national strategy by Jiang Zemin in March 2000.

  8. China shock - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_shock

    A 2023 review of existing economic research concluded that US-China trade since the early 2000s caused aggregate welfare gains in both countries; had winners and losers in the US; and was not a leading cause of manufacturing employment decline in the US. [12] Experts have argued that the China trade shock has ended.

  9. The pattern of diversifying away from China has been going on for years, with many Chinese firms also investing in manufacturing overseas as they seek out lower costs, according to a July report ...