Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A.) Federalists were in favor of increased taxes to help support public programs; Antifederalists were opposed to raising taxes. B.) Federalists favored the Constitution; Antifederalist favored stronger state governments. C.) Federalists wanted to create political parties for government; Antifederalists were opposed to political parties. D.)
Federalists believed in representative government, while Anti-Federalists supported direct democracy for representation. Explanation: A Federalist would argue that the people should be represented through a representative government.
2. Describe the Anti-Federalists: - Anti-Federalists feared that the Constitution made the states and people too weak. They argued for more protection of individual rights. What Anti-Federalists Believed (explain 5 points): 1. Thought it would be better to maintain the existing state power. 2. Preferred a less powerful central government. 3.
Anti-Federalists - Who were most Anti-Federalists? Far from being unpatriotic or un-American, the Anti-Federalists sincerely believed that the new government was an enemy of freedom, the very freedom they had just fought a war to ensure. Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Adams, John Hancock, Richard Henry Lee, and Patrick Henry led the Anti-Federalists.
However, I can appreciate the Federalists' viewpoint on the necessity of a strong national government for addressing broad issues. Explanation: Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists: A Perspective. When considering whether I agree more with the Federalists or the Anti-Federalists, I find myself leaning more towards the Anti-Federalists. Here are ...
What distinguished Federalists from Anti-Federalists in particular? Some states desired a powerful, centralized administration. Federalists were the term for the citizens who held this viewpoint. The Antifederalists, who favored the idea of small, state governments, were the people who rejected the idea of one main government.
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists. The ratification of the Constitution generated intense debate between two opposing groups: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Below are essential arguments attributed to each faction: Federalist: The nation needs the new Constitution in order to survive.
Federalists advocated for a strong central government while Anti-Federalists preferred stronger state governments, fearing tyranny from a powerful federal authority. The Federalists believed that a unified government would promote stability and growth, while Anti-Federalists sought to ensure individual liberties and local governance.
The Anti-Federalists wanted to ensure small states had equal representation and thus wanted a more powerful state-level government. C. The Federalists, like John Adams, believed in equal power and wanted to give rights to women. The Anti-Federalists wanted to maintain power in a small group of people and did not believe in giving rights to ...
Federalists favored a strong national government for stability and unity, while Anti-Federalists preferred strong state governments to protect individual rights and prevent tyranny. Key points of contention included the scope of government power, representation, and the necessity of a Bill of Rights. Explanation: Federalists vs Anti-Federalists