Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) is a free-software license published by the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the LGPL into their own (even proprietary) software without being required by the terms of a strong copyleft license to release the source code of their own components.
Network usage is not considered private use [28] Copylefted [27] Yes [28] GNU General Public License: Free Software Foundation: 3.0: June 2007: GPLv3 compatible only [29] [30] Copylefted [27] Copylefted [27] Yes [31] Yes [31] Copylefted [27] Yes [31] GNU Lesser General Public License: Free Software Foundation: 3.0: June 2007: With restrictions ...
License compatibility is a legal framework that allows for pieces of software with different software licenses to be distributed together. The need for such a framework arises because the different licenses can contain contradictory requirements, rendering it impossible to legally combine source code from separately-licensed software in order to create and publish a new program.
The GPL remains the most popular license of this type, but there are other significant examples. The FSF has crafted the Lesser General Public License (LGPL) for libraries. Mozilla uses the Mozilla Public License (MPL) for their releases, including Firefox. IBM drafted the Common Public License (CPL) and later adopted the Eclipse Public License ...
The version numbers diverged in 1999 when version 2.1 of the LGPL was released, which renamed it the GNU Lesser General Public License to reflect its place in the philosophy. The GPLv2 was also modified to refer to the new name of the LGPL, but its version number remained the same, resulting in the original GPLv2 not being recognised by the ...
The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify and redistribute". [6] GitHub's choosealicense website describes the permissive MIT license as "[letting] people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable."
Free-software licenses that use "weak" copyleft include the GNU Lesser General Public License and the Mozilla Public License. The GNU General Public License is an example of a license implementing strong copyleft. An even stronger copyleft license is the AGPL, which requires the publishing of the source code for software as a service use cases.
Apache License 2.0, GNU GPLv2+ and commercial license Amazon.com, Inc. C: Continuous US Schannel: Microsoft: No Proprietary: Microsoft Corporation Windows 11, 2021-10-05 US Secure Transport: Apple Inc. Yes APSL 2.0: Apple Inc. 57337.20.44 (OS X 10.11.2), 2015-12-08 US wolfSSL (previously CyaSSL) wolfSSL [24] Yes GNU GPLv2+ and commercial ...