enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Griswold v. Connecticut - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswold_v._Connecticut

    Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to use contraceptives without government restriction. [1]

  3. Eisenstadt v. Baird - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstadt_v._Baird

    Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that established the right of unmarried people to possess contraception on the same basis as married couples. The Court struck down a Massachusetts law prohibiting the distribution of contraceptives to unmarried people for the purpose of preventing pregnancy, ruling ...

  4. Carey v. Population Services International - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carey_v._Population...

    Carey v. Population Services International, 431 U.S. 678 (1977), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that it was unconstitutional to prohibit anyone other than a licensed pharmacist to distribute nonprescription contraceptives to persons 16 years of age or over, to prohibit the distribution of nonprescription contraceptives by any adult to minors under 16 ...

  5. Abortion Opponents Are Also Threatening Birth Control Access

    www.aol.com/abortion-opponents-threatening-birth...

    W hen the U.S. Supreme Court issued its 1965 ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut and legalized the use of contraception by married women, the public response was muted. There is little evidence of ...

  6. Why is the 'Right to Contraception Act' considered necessary?

    www.aol.com/why-contraception-act-considered...

    Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, there has been confusion about where certain contraception methods stand, and whether states can revoke access to some forms of birth control.

  7. There are enough votes on the Supreme Court to uphold new restrictions on Plan B and birth control, experts say. ‘Angry Court’ Might Come After Contraception Next, Experts Warn Skip to main ...

  8. Zubik v. Burwell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zubik_v._Burwell

    Zubik v. Burwell, 578 U.S. 403 (2016), was a case before the United States Supreme Court on whether religious institutions other than churches should be exempt from the contraceptive mandate, a regulation adopted by the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that requires non-church employers to cover certain contraceptives for their ...

  9. More young people choosing permanent sterilization after ...

    www.aol.com/news/more-young-people-choosing...

    The paper, published Friday in JAMA Health Forum, is the first to focus specifically on the contraception choices of women and men ages 18 to 30 after the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v ...