enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. DirecTV and Disney Resolve Dispute, Ending Blackout of ABC ...

    www.aol.com/abc-espn-pulled-directv-amid...

    After a 13-day carriage dispute, Disney and DirecTV have reached a new agreement, restoring ABC, ESPN and other networks. The resolution comes one day ahead of the 76th Primetime Emmy Awards ...

  3. Disney-DirecTV dispute: ESPN and other channels go dark ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/disney-directv-dispute-espn-other...

    The two companies have been negotiating a new contract to keep Disney's content on DirecTV's satellite and streaming services, including U-Verse TV, as a five-year contract ended Sept. 1.

  4. How to watch sports with YouTube TV amid Disney-DirecTV dispute?

    www.aol.com/watch-sports-youtube-tv-amid...

    Due to a contract dispute between DirecTV and Disney, Disney pulled most of its programming from DirecTV servers yesterday, leaving DirecTV owners without channels like ESPN, ESPN2, ACC Network ...

  5. Carriage dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carriage_dispute

    The 2012 dispute between DirecTV and Viacom is an example of a dispute involving a non-terrestrial broadcaster. Viacom's cable/satellite channels, including Comedy Central , Nickelodeon and MTV , were blacked out for some 20 million DirecTV subscribers, who together represented about 20 percent of all U.S. households who subscribed to cable or ...

  6. Disney–Charter Communications dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney–Charter...

    Disney temporarily decreased the price of the ad-supported version of Disney+ from US$7.99 to US$1.99 amid the dispute [33] and the price of Hulu with live TV. [34] Disney promoted Hulu, Disney+, and ESPN+ during the dispute, leading to vitriol from some Spectrum subscribers online. [35]

  7. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T_Mobility_LLC_v...

    AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...

  8. California to end Walgreens contract after abortion dispute - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/california-end-walgreens...

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday withdrew a $54 million contract with Walgreens after the pharmacy giant indicated it would not sell an abortion pill by mail in some conservative-led states.

  9. Fox Broadcasting Co. v. Dish Network, LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_Broadcasting_Co._v...

    Fox Broadcasting Co. v. Dish Network, LLC (C.D. Cal. January 12, 2015) is a copyright case in which the United States District Court for the Central District of California, by granting partial summary judgment, denied most parts of the copyright claims presented by Fox Broadcasting Company (Fox) against Dish Network (Dish) for its service, a ...