enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celotex_Corp._v._Catrett

   Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.Written by Associate Justice William Rehnquist, the decision of the Court held that a party moving for summary judgment need show only that the opposing party lacks evidence sufficient to support its case.

3. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KSR_International_Co._v...

   On April 30, 2007, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the judgment of the Federal Circuit, holding that the disputed claim 4 of the patent was obvious under the requirements of 35 U.S.C. §103, and that in "rejecting the District Court’s rulings, the Court of Appeals analyzed the issue in a narrow, rigid manner inconsistent with §103 and our precedents," referring to the Federal Circuit ...

4. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A&M_Records,_Inc._v...

   Napster's claims that it enabled legal sampling, space shifting, and permissive distribution (some artists had consented to the presence of their songs on the Napster service) were also rejected by the court. Furthermore, the court found that Napster could control the infringing behavior of the service's users, and therefore had a duty to do so ...

5. Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co.

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feist_Publications,_Inc...

   The text claim would have barred anyone from copying the text of a case from a West case law reporter, since the copied text would include West enhancements to which West claimed copyright. In a 1986 pre- Feist case, West's citation copyright claim was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in a preliminary injunction case ...

6. List of judgements of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_judgements_of_the...

   Cases are listed in order of their neutral citation and where possible a link to the official text of the decision in PDF format has been provided. The case summaries below are not official or authoritative. Unless otherwise noted, cases were heard by a panel of 5 judges. Cases involving Scots law are highlighted in orange.

7. Fulton v. City of Philadelphia - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_v._City_of_Philadelphia

   Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, 593 U.S. 522 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania violated First Amendment rights of a Catholic foster care agency by refusing to renew the agency's contract unless it agreed to certify married same-sex couples as foster parents.

8. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_Corp._v...

   McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), is a US employment law case by the United States Supreme Court regarding the burdens and nature of proof in proving a Title VII case and the order in which plaintiffs and defendants present proof. It was the seminal case in the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework.

9. Padilla v. Kentucky - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padilla_v._Kentucky

   The case extended the Supreme Court's prior decisions on criminal defendants' Sixth Amendment right to counsel to immigration consequences. The duties of Counsel recognized in Padilla are broad. After Padilla, if the law is unambiguous, attorneys must advise their criminal clients that deportation will result from a conviction. Also, if the ...