Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An individual right is a moral claim to freedom of action. [1] Group rights, also known as collective rights, are rights held by a group as a whole rather than individually by its members. [2] In contrast, individual rights are rights held by individual people; even if they are group-differentiated, which most rights are, they remain individual ...
"Common good" is defined not as a utilitarian aggregation of individual goods, nor as a subjugation of the individual to the community. Rather, it is the unification of individual and community goods that leads to personal and social flourishing. [ 17 ]
The idea of a common good plays a role in Confucian political philosophy, which on most interpretations stresses the importance of the subordination of individual interests to group or collective interests, [45] or at the very least, the mutual dependence between the flourishing of the individual and the flourishing of the group. [46]
The author suggested that a nuanced understanding of ordered liberty allows for recognizing new rights while remaining grounded in legal principles and respecting the balance between individual freedom and societal interests. Grothouse identifies two main arguments surrounding the interpretation of "liberty" under the Due Process Clause.
Individual rights are rights held by individual people regardless of their group membership or lack thereof. Do groups have rights ? Some argue that when soldiers bond in combat , the group becomes like an organism in itself and has rights which trump the rights of any individual soldier.
"Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical" is an essay by John Rawls, published in 1985. [1] In it he describes his conception of justice. It comprises two main principles of liberty and equality; the second is subdivided into fair equality of opportunity and the difference principle.
Self-ownership, also known as sovereignty of the individual or individual sovereignty, is the concept of property in one's own person, expressed as the moral or natural right of a person to have bodily integrity and be the exclusive controller of one's own body and life.
The purposes of the margin of appreciation are to balance individual rights with national interests and to resolve any potential conflicts. It has been suggested that the European Court should generally refer to the State's decision, as it is an international court, instead of a bill of rights. [3]