Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
S.E. — South Eastern Reporter; S.E.2d — South Eastern Reporter, 2nd Series; SCOTUS — Supreme Court of the United States (Supreme Court of the United States) SI — Statutory instruments; S/J — Summary judgment; SMJ — Subject-matter jurisdiction; So. — Southern Reporter; So. 2d — Southern Reporter, 2nd Series; SOL — Statute of ...
The ruling superseded Sol. Op. 132, I-1 C.B. 92 (1922), "since the position stated therein is set forth under the current statute and regulations in this Revenue Ruling", referring to 26 U.S.C. § 104 and 26 C.F.R. § 1.104-1.
A W. Tunnins of the grand lodge of Railway Clerks also would be a guest speaker. [128] On March 31, the steel union filed a petition for a removal or modification of the injunction order banning strikers from picketing the mill plant. [128] Speaking on the strike at the time, Earl R. Broweder stated, [129]
Marion County Election Board, 472 F.3d 949 (7th Cir. 2007); cert. granted, 551 U.S. 1192 (2007). Holding; A statute requiring voters to show a picture ID is constitutional. Court membership; Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia Anthony Kennedy · David Souter Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (in case citations, 7th Cir.) is the U.S. federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the courts in the following districts: Central District of Illinois; Northern District of Illinois; Southern District of Illinois; Northern District of Indiana; Southern District of Indiana
United States v. Throckmorton (98 U.S. 61) is an 1878 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on civil procedure, specifically res judicata, in cases heard at equity.A unanimous Court affirmed an appeal of a decision by the District Court for California upholding a Mexican-era land claim, holding that collateral estoppel bars untimely motions to set aside the verdict where the purportedly ...
Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the warrantless seizure of evidence which is in plain view. The discovery of the evidence does not have to be inadvertent, although that is a characteristic of most legitimate plain-view seizures.
Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that state and federal courts cannot, on a motion to vacate or to modify an arbitration award, expand the limited scope of judicial review specified in 9 U.S.C. §§ 10 and 11, including terms that were agreed upon by the parties.