Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The logo of Fortune's 100 Best Companies to Work For list. The 100 Best Companies to Work For is an annual list published by Fortune magazine that ranks U.S. companies based on employee happiness and perks. [1] Like the Fortune 500, the list includes both public and private companies. [2] The list was first published in 1998.
This template should always be substituted (i.e., use {{subst:Four Award Message}}). Official Four Award recognition template. (See eligibility requirements and reviewing instructions .)
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Pages for logged out editors learn more
Title of the work which received the award; if the work is notable, place it within double brackets. Example [[All That Jazz]] String: suggested: Role: Role: If award was for a performance in a play, movie, or television program, indicate the role played by the award recipient; do not Wikilink. Example Alice: String: optional
This template is used on approximately 5,900 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage . Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them.
Place the template as the first line within the table cell containing the list of nominations that the award applies to. Do not place this template on a separate table row, as it will no longer be accessible to blind Wikipedians.
/core: Displays the award for the specified level (0-22) by calling /compose with the appropriate parameters. Edit this template to change the template names or text displayed for each award. /select: Determines which level of award to display, based on the length of service and number of edits. Edit this template to change the award requirements.
Research on the sociotechnical systems approach to work has shown that this approach is related to increased employee satisfaction and motivation. [6] Another important step towards the high performance organization was the Japanese Revolution in manufacturing, which pointed out another flaw to the scientific model of production. [1]