Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This statistics -related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Further confirmation of this theory is found in evidence that misclassification is associated with higher rates of depression and considering suicide. [39] Pervasive racial and/or ethnic misclassification is also related to a weaker sense of racial/ethnic identity, [ 42 ] which has negative consequences for the self-esteem and self-image of ...
Statistical bias exists in numerous stages of the data collection and analysis process, including: the source of the data, the methods used to collect the data, the estimator chosen, and the methods used to analyze the data. Data analysts can take various measures at each stage of the process to reduce the impact of statistical bias in their ...
The effect(s) of such misclassification can vary from an overestimation to an underestimation of the true value. [4] Statisticians have developed methods to adjust for this type of bias, which may assist somewhat in compensating for this problem when known and when it is quantifiable. [5]
In practice, as in most of statistics, the difficulties and subtleties are associated with modeling the probability distributions effectively—in this case, (= =). The Bayes classifier is a useful benchmark in statistical classification.
Recall bias is of particular concern in retrospective studies that use a case-control design to investigate the etiology of a disease or psychiatric condition. [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] For example, in studies of risk factors for breast cancer , women who have had the disease may search their memories more thoroughly than members of the unaffected ...
Much of statistical theory revolves around the minimization of one or both of these errors, though the complete elimination of either is an impossibility if the outcome is not determined by a known, observable causal process. The knowledge of type I errors and type II errors is widely used in medical science, biometrics and computer science.
Often the participants may be broken up into separate test groups, some of which are given statistics about the group that directly contradict what they were presented in the case study. Others may even be told directly that the individual in the case study was atypical for the group as a whole.