Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Project MUSE is a provider of digital humanities and social science content for the scholarly community. MUSE provides full-text versions of scholarly journals and books. Subscription Project MUSE, Johns Hopkins University Press [116] PsycINFO: Psychology: The largest resource devoted to peer-reviewed literature in behavioral science and mental ...
Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file; Special pages
Independent sources ; General essays. Reliable sources checklist (WP:RSVETTING) Cherrypicking (WP:CHERRYPICK) Potentially unreliable sources ; Reliable source examples ; Topic-specific essays. Identifying reliable sources (history) Identifying reliable sources (law) Identifying reliable sources (science)
Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines. . Released in beta in November 2004, the Google Scholar index includes peer-reviewed online academic journals and books, conference papers, theses and dissertations, preprints, abstracts, technical reports, and other ...
In other cases, a consensus has been formed to not use a given source. In such cases, especially if the reasons for unreliability are not obvious, it may be helpful to subsequent editors if editors post a note about this (e.g., on the article's talk page). Consensus can change, even about sources; no list should be treated as a finished project ...
Sources of information are commonly categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources.In brief, a primary source is one close to the event with firsthand knowledge (for example, an eyewitness); a secondary source is at least one step removed (for example, a book about an event written by someone not involved in it); and a tertiary source is an encyclopaedia or textbook that provides a ...
Sources written and reviewed by the advocates of such marginal ideas can be used to describe notable personal opinions, but extreme care should be taken when using such sources lest the more controversial aspects of their opinions be taken at face value or, worse, asserted as fact. If the only independent sources discussing a subject are of low ...
Inclusion on the list doesn't automatically mean the absolute truth is on these websites, so always be critical and compare information between different sources. The content of the subsections is alphabetically organized. Please add free online sources if you know some that are missing in this list, but try to keep it relevant and trustworthy.