Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Review articles initially identify the scope and aim. [4] If submitting the review article to a journal, the author must familiarise themselves with the theme of the journal as well as its conditions for submission. Some journals only accept review articles whereas others strictly publish original research. [8]
Scopus is the world's largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed research literature. It contains over 20,500 titles from more than 5,000 international publishers. While it is a subscription product, authors can review and update their profiles via ORCID.org or by first searching for their profile at the free Scopus author lookup page.
Husserl Studies: The Inklings: Journal of Inklings Studies; VII: Journal of the Marion E. Wade Center; Mythlore: C. L. R. James: The CLR James Journal: Henry James: The Henry James Review: Ben Jonson: Ben Jonson Journal: James Joyce: James Joyce Quarterly: Franz Kafka: Journal of the Kafka Society of America: Immanuel Kant: Kant Yearbook; Kant ...
Content usually takes the form of articles presenting original research, review articles, or book reviews.The purpose of an academic journal, according to Henry Oldenburg (the first editor of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society), is to give researchers a venue to "impart their knowledge to one another, and contribute what they can to the Grand design of improving natural knowledge ...
There is generally a "prejudice" in Wikipedia toward the use of review articles versus original research articles as sources. This is completely understandable in that original research articles are often singular statements of an experimental result without confirmation through replication that is key to the scientific method.
Peer review is generally considered necessary to academic quality and is used in most major scholarly journals. However, peer review does not prevent publication of invalid research, [18] and as experimentally controlled studies of this process are difficult to arrange, direct evidence that peer review improves the quality of published papers ...
Peer review in scientific journals assumes that the article reviewed has been honestly prepared. The process occasionally detects fraud, but is not designed to do so. [204] When peer review fails and a paper is published with fraudulent or otherwise irreproducible data, the paper may be retracted. A 1998 experiment on peer review with a ...
List of academic journals about specific authors; List of accounting journals; List of African studies journals; List of anarchist periodicals; List of anthropology journals; List of arachnology journals; List of astronomy journals; List of bioethics journals; List of bioinformatics journals; List of biology journals; List of botany journals ...