Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In Duncan v. Becerra and Rhode v. Becerra, he struck down portions of 2016 California Proposition 63 that prohibited possession of high-capacity magazines and required background checks for ammunition purchases, respectively. The state appealed both decisions; [7] the ruling in Duncan v. Bonta was reversed by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of ...
In March 2019, in the case Duncan v. Becerra (currently Duncan v. Bonta), [7] the Federal District Court stayed enforcement of the new law as the state failed to show how this law didn't violate the Second Amendment or the property rights of owners of previously legal goods.
The appeal was assigned to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which, in an unprecedented manner, called for an en-banc review of the State of California's appeal to Benitez's ruling in Duncan v. Bonta, opting out of the traditional three-judge panel review process of previous appeals. California Governor Gavin Newsom issued a post on the social ...
Bonta's office, in an emailed response, said it is reviewing the filings and that the attorney general "remains fully committed to holding accountable the fossil fuel industry for its decades-long ...
Bonta – 5-foot-8, built like a middleweight boxer – was a nationally coveted prep soccer recruit, and he captained Yale’s soccer squad as defensive midfielder in the early ’90s before he ...
(The Center Square) – Attorney General Rob Bonta announced that he has secured $625,000 in restitution for Californians whose rental applications have been denied due to rental debt accrued ...
One of these dissents was in Duncan v. Bonta , a challenge to a California law that limits gun magazine capacity to 10 bullets. The en banc panel upheld the law, and VanDyke accused the majority of "distrust[ing] gun owners and think[ing] the Second Amendment is a vestigial organ of their living constitution" and having an "undefeated, 50–0 ...
Duncan v. Bonta was heard en banc by the Ninth Circuit Court on June 22, 2021. [ 33 ] The en banc Court overturned the lower appellate panel in its ruling, holding that California's regulation of firearms did not violate the 2nd Amendment.