Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Judicial Watch paid Bannon's group Victory Film Project $382,143 for the film. [46] Politico described the film as an "infomercial for the work of Judicial Watch". [47] Judicial Watch has advertised on Breitbart for a number of years. [48] Judicial Watch's president Tom Fitton said "Liberal activists want to destroy Breitbart, but we won't be ...
The conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch had filed a lawsuit in March after it sought the communications between the Democratic prosecutor’s office and the special counsel, as well as the ...
Thomas J. Fitton (born May 30, 1968) is an American conservative activist and the president of Judicial Watch.. Fitton is a long-term senior member of the Council for National Policy, a conservative umbrella organization for groups such as Judicial Watch. [1]
During his tenure, Judicial Watch filed several lawsuits against Bill Clinton and the Clinton administration. Klayman left Judicial Watch to pursue political office. In 2004, Klayman ran for the US Senate from Florida but lost the Republican Party primary, finishing seventh out of eight candidates. [22] After his run for the Senate, Klayman ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
This category includes non-governmental groups in the United States whose stated mission includes monitoring branches of the state or federal governments for fraud, waste, abuse, corruption, mismanagement, illegal activity, campaign donor influence, abuse of authority, miscarriage of justice, and so forth.
The full sentence is: Judicial Watch (JW) is an American conservative activist group[1] and self-styled watchdog group[2][3] that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate alleged misconduct by government officials.
The Service was a complaints-handling body, quasi-independent of the Society. It was part of the Law Society, but operated independently. [citation needed] The services offered to consumers were confidential and free at the point of use, the profession having rejected the idea of charging a flat fee as do some other professional complaints services, for example, that of architects.