enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. California Endangered Species Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Endangered...

    This decision was then appealed, and the California Court of Appeal in May of 2022 upheld that bumblebees (and all other invertebrates) are protected under the CESA, because (1) the statute has since 1984 explicitly listed invertebrates under the law's definition of fish ("a wild fish, mollusk, crustacean, invertebrate, amphibian, or part ...

  3. Court upholds California rules to protect fish, but Newsom ...

    www.aol.com/court-upholds-california-rules...

    The March 15 ruling by Sacramento Superior Court Judge Stephen Acquisto rejected a litany of lawsuits by water districts against the State Water Resources Control Board’s plan to boost river ...

  4. List of successful petitions for review under Article 112a of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_successful...

    R 7/09 [5] was a petition for review of T 27/07 [6] and is the very first case in which a petition for review was successful since the institution of the procedure. In that case, the Enlarged Board of Appeal held that a violation of the right to be heard (a right guaranteed by Article 113(1) EPC) occurred during the underlying appeal proceedings, because the Board of Appeal apparently failed ...

  5. Appeal procedure before the European Patent Office - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_procedure_before...

    EPO headquarters in Munich, Germany, where the Boards of Appeal were based until 2017.. Decisions of the first instance departments of the European Patent Office (EPO) can be appealed, i.e. challenged, before the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, in a judicial procedure (proper to an administrative court), as opposed to an administrative procedure. [1]

  6. List of decisions and opinions of the Enlarged Board of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_decisions_and...

    This is a list of decisions and opinions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) in chronological order of their date of issuance. The list includes decisions under Article 112(1)(a) EPC (following a referral from a Board of Appeal), opinions under Article 112(1)(b) EPC (following a referral from the President of the EPO), "to ensure uniform application of the law ...

  7. National Audubon Society v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Audubon_Society_v...

    Superior Court (Supreme Court of California, 1983, 33 Cal.3d 419) was a key case in California highlighting the conflict between the public trust doctrine and appropriative water rights. [1] The Public Trust Doctrine is based on the principle that certain resources (such as navigable waters) are too valuable to be privately owned and must ...

  8. California Courts of Appeal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Courts_of_Appeal

    The California Constitution originally made the Supreme Court the only appellate court for the whole state. As the state's population skyrocketed during the 19th century, the Supreme Court was expanded from three to seven justices, and then the Court began hearing the majority of appeals in three-justice panels.

  9. Petition for review under the European Patent Convention

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petition_for_review_under...

    Under the European Patent Convention (EPC), a petition for review is a request to the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) to review a decision of a board of appeal. The procedure was introduced in Article 112a EPC when the EPC was revised in 2000, to form the so-called "EPC 2000". [1]