enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Alvarez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Alvarez

    United States v. Alvarez , 567 U.S. 709 (2012), is a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was unconstitutional. The Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was a federal law that criminalized false statements about having a military medal.

  3. Stolen Valor Act of 2005 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_Valor_Act_of_2005

    Struck down by United States v. Alvarez in a 6–3 decision on June 28, 2012 The Stolen Valor Act of 2005 , signed into law by President George W. Bush on December 20, 2006, [ 1 ] was a U.S. law that broadened the provisions of previous U.S. law addressing the unauthorized wear, manufacture, or sale of any military decorations and medals .

  4. San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Arts...

    San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee, 483 U.S. 522 (1987), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States interpreting the trademark rights of the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) to regulate the use of the word "Olympic" under the Amateur Sports Act of 1978.

  5. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Hudson_Gas...

    Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission, 447 U.S. 557 (1980), was an important case decided by the United States Supreme Court that laid out a four-part test for determining when restrictions on commercial speech violated the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

  6. 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/303_Creative_LLC_v._Elenis

    303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, 600 U.S. 570 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court decision that dealt with the intersection of anti-discrimination law in public accommodations with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In a 6–3 decision, the Court found for a website designer, ruling that the state ...

  7. United States v. Arthrex, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Arthrex,_Inc.

    United States v. Arthrex, Inc. , 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution as it related to patent judges on the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

  8. United States v. American Library Ass'n - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._American...

    The Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) was passed by Congress in 2000. CIPA was Congress's third attempt to regulate obscenity on the Internet, but the first two (the Communications Decency Act of 1996 and the Child Online Protection Act of 1998) were struck down by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional free speech restrictions, largely due to vagueness and overbreadth issues that ...

  9. Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_Christian_School...

    Winn, 563 U.S. 125 (2011), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving taxpayer standing under Article Three of the United States Constitution. [ 2 ] A group of Arizona taxpayers challenged a state law providing tax credits to people who donate to school tuition organizations providing scholarships to students attending ...

  1. Related searches united states v. alvarez holding center for the arts and sciences clute tx

    united states v alvarezstolen valor v alvarez