Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Specifically, the court adopted the three-pronged test required for any encroachment of Article 21 right: legality, or the existence of a certain law; necessity, in terms of a legitimate state objective; and proportionality, which requires a rational connection between an object and the means required to get that object.
Article 21 was released in theaters in Kerala on 28 July 2023, and successfully extended its release to theaters in Karnataka and Tamil Nadu through Galaxy Cinemas from 4 August 2023. [5] Author and orator M. K. Sanu who recently celebrated his 96th birthday, attended a screening of the film. He commended the movie, stating that it effectively ...
Article 372: Article 372 provides for the continuity of existing laws and their adaptation until altered or repealed by a competent legislature or other authority. This article ensured that laws enacted by the British colonial government or by the rulers of princely states continued to be valid in independent India until they were amended ...
An Illinois man is accused of inflicting prolonged abuse and torture on his 16-year-old stepson — who died a week after he was found unresponsive, brutally beaten, covered in burns and starved.
Entertainment icon Pat Boone has a solution for Hollywood – embrace faith and positivity. "People waste millions making sordid, corrupt films that fail. Once in a while they get big, to the ...
There’s no doubt that we love our furry friends, but let’s be honest, they have all gone through a bout of naughtiness, mostly thanks to their playful and smart personalities. Those who are ...
Gandhi filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order on the grounds that it violated Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution. The Union responded in their written submissions that her passport was impounded because her presence was likely to be required in connection with legal proceedings before ...
A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in which the Court ruled that Article 21 of the Constitution did not require Indian courts to apply a due process of law standard. [1]