enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits...

   [29] [30] Judge Kevin Elsenheimer issued a temporary restraining order for a forensic exam of the county's voting machines [31] and allowed Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to intervene in the case. [32] Subsequently, DePerno published the forensic exam report by Russ Ramsland, who was a Republican congressional nominee. [33] [34]

3. Restraining order - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restraining_order

   Finally, an extreme risk restraining order is a form of US restraining order, currently used in 13 states. Other forms of restraining order will sometimes order firearms restrictions as a part of a larger injunction intended to protect a specific individual. But with an extreme risk restraining order, the sole focus is on the firearms restrictions.

4. Domestic Abuse Restraining Order - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_Abuse_Restraining...

   Restraining order successfully petitioned by a woman named Angela against her abuser under Wisconsin's domestic abuse laws. A Domestic Abuse Restraining Order (DARO) is a form of restraining order or order of protection used under the domestic abuse laws of the state of Wisconsin, [1] [2] USA, and enforceable throughout the US under invocation of the Full Faith and Credit Clause in the ...

5. How to file for a restraining order against domestic violence ...

   www.aol.com/file-restraining-order-against...

   For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

6. Michigan to seek temporary restraining order to block Big Ten ...

   www.aol.com/sports/michigan-seek-temporary...

   No. 3 Michigan plays at No. 10 Penn State at Noon ET on Saturday.

7. Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_of_Castle_Rock_v...

   Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, 7–2, that a town and its police department could not be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for refusing to enforce a restraining order, even though the refusal led to the murders of a woman's three children by her estranged husband.