Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio is the highest court in the U.S. state of Ohio, with final authority over interpretations of Ohio law and the Ohio Constitution. The court has seven members, a chief justice and six associate justices, who are elected at large by the voters of Ohio for six-year terms. The court has a total of 1,550 other ...
The United States Clean Air Act is a law intended to reduce the impacts of air pollution.In the Clean Air Act, there is a section called the "Good Neighbor" provision, which mandates states to implement policies to reduce the impact of air pollution on other states, such as asthma or bronchitis. [1]
State agencies promulgate rules and regulations (sometimes called administrative law) in the Register of Ohio, which are in turn codified in the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC). Ohio's legal system is based on common law , which is interpreted by case law through the decisions of the Supreme Court, District Courts of Appeals, and trial courts ...
In what was a debate over which rules of grammar to follow in reading a law, the state's highest court reversed the rulings of the Canton-based 5th District Court of Appeals in July 2023 and Stark ...
The Ohio Supreme Court building in Columbus There are several other levels of elected judiciary in the Ohio court system: State court of claims , which has jurisdiction over all civil actions against the State of Ohio in situations in which the state has waived its sovereign immunity .
Oct. 24—The Center Square The Ohio Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with Secretary of State Frank LaRose and upheld new directives for ballot drop boxes across the state. In a 4-3 ruling, the ...
While Ohio voters focus on the presidential and U.S. Senate races this fall, an epic battle will play out over which political party controls the Ohio Supreme Court. Republicans have held majority ...
Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio, 471 U.S. 626 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that states can require an advertiser to disclose certain information without violating the advertiser's First Amendment free speech protections as long as the disclosure requirements are reasonably related to the State's interest in ...