Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Administrative law is a division of law governing the activities of executive branch agencies of government. Administrative law includes executive branch rulemaking (executive branch rules are generally referred to as "regulations"), adjudication, and the enforcement of laws. Administrative law is considered a branch of public law.
Section 551 of the Administrative Procedure Act gives the following definitions: . Rulemaking is "an agency process for formulating, amending, or repealing a rule." A rule in turn is "the whole or a part of an agency statement of general or particular applicability and future effect designed to implement, interpret, or prescribe law or policy."
Goldberg v. Kelly (1970) - When does state or federal law create rights protected by due process? Mathews v. Eldridge (1976) - What level of procedural due process is required? Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. (1982) – Does an adjudicating agency's termination of an action due to its own failure to comply with the law deny due process to the ...
This category includes United States case law interpreting the general processes of administrative law and agency authority to make and interpret it. Subcategories This category has the following 2 subcategories, out of 2 total.
Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134 (1944), is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that an administrative agency's interpretative rules deserve deference according to their persuasiveness. The court adopted a case-by-case test, the Skidmore deference, which considers the rulings, interpretations, and opinions of the administrator ...
Legal Information Institute administrative law overview; Key administrative law decisions by the US Supreme Court; Federal administrative agency index via Washburn School of Law; Administrative Law Review published by Washington College of Law, American University and the American Bar Association; Cybertelecom :: Administrative Procedures Act
United States administrative case law (2 C, 119 P) Code of Federal Regulations (2 C, 17 P) I. Independent agencies of the United States government (37 C, 100 P) L.
Instead, under U.S. administrative law, to ask the court to order changes in a rule, a party must argue that the rule is: Arbitrary and capricious and/or unsupported by the record. Most frequently, objectors will argue that, even if the judge is not an expert, the judge can tell that there is an obvious gap in the agency's data or analysis.