enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Criminal procedure in South Africa - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_procedure_in...

    The Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 lists four methods of securing the attendance of an accused person in court. [4] These bear an important relationship to the constitutional rights of freedom and security of the person, [5] of freedom of movement and residence, [6] of access to the courts [7] and of "arrested, detained and accused persons."

  3. South African criminal law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_criminal_law

    South African criminal law is the body of national law relating to crime in South Africa.In the definition of Van der Walt et al., a crime is "conduct which common or statute law prohibits and expressly or impliedly subjects to punishment remissible by the state alone and which the offender cannot avoid by his own act once he has been convicted."

  4. False accusation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation

    A false accusation is a claim or allegation of wrongdoing that is untrue and/or otherwise unsupported by facts. [1] False accusations are also known as groundless accusations, unfounded accusations, false allegations, false claims or unsubstantiated allegations. They can occur in any of the following contexts: Informally in everyday life

  5. Nel v Le Roux - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nel_v_Le_Roux

    Nel v Le Roux NO and Others is a 1996 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in the area of criminal procedure.The Constitutional Court dismissed a constitutional challenge to section 205 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, which allowed judicial officers to compel witnesses to provide evidence in pre-trial examinations.

  6. S v Thebus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S_v_Thebus

    S v Thebus and Another is a 2003 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in the area of criminal law and criminal procedure.The court unanimously affirmed that the doctrine of common purpose was compatible with the Constitution, upholding two murder convictions on that basis.

  7. Khumalo v Holomisa - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khumalo_v_Holomisa

    Khumalo and Others v Holomisa is a landmark decision in the South African law of delict.It was decided by the Constitutional Court of South Africa on 21 May 2002. Handing down judgment for a unanimous court, Justice Kate O'Regan held that the existing common law of defamation is consistent with the Bill of Rights.

  8. S v Lavhengwa - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S_v_Lavhengwa

    In S v Lavhengwa, an important case in South African criminal law, it was held that the right created in section 35(3)(a) of the Constitution, which provides that the right to a fair trial includes the right to be informed of the charge with sufficient detail to answer it, implies that the criminal charge itself must be clear and unambiguous.

  9. Law of South Africa - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_South_Africa

    Countries (in pink) which share the mixed South African legal system. South Africa has a 'hybrid' or 'mixed' legal system, [1] formed by the interweaving of a number of distinct legal traditions: a civil law system inherited from the Dutch, a common law system inherited from the British, and a customary law system inherited from indigenous Africans (often termed African Customary Law, of which ...