Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Iowa Court of Appeals is the intermediate-level appellate court of the state of Iowa. Its purpose is to review appeals from trial court decisions which are referred to the court by the Iowa Supreme Court. The court decides the vast majority of appeals filed from trial courts in the state of Iowa, and its decisions are final unless further ...
On May 2, 2019, Governor Kim Reynolds appointed May to the Iowa Court of Appeals to fill the vacancy left by the elevation of Christopher McDonald to the Iowa Supreme Court. [4] May served as the co-chair of a committee to revise the Iowa Rules of Appellate Procedure.
The Court is the "court of last resort" or the highest court in the Iowa state court system. Its opinions are binding on all other Iowa state courts. The Iowa Supreme Court has the sole power to admit persons to practice as attorneys in the courts of Iowa, to prescribe rules to supervise attorney conduct, and to discipline attorneys.
Years of litigation over Iowa's law blocking the adoption of face mask mandates have ended, for now, with more of a whimper than a bang. The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday ruled that ...
The court is composed of 11 active judges and is based primarily at the Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse in St. Louis, Missouri, and secondarily at the Warren E. Burger United States Courthouse in St. Paul, Minnesota. It is one of 13 United States courts of appeals.
Two Supreme Court justices, two appellate judges and 61 district judges are standing for retention elections in November. Here's what you need to know
Despite its high rate of unanimous decisions, the Iowa Supreme Court deadlocked on some key issues in its 2022-23 term, from abortion to COVID orders.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit cited Tinker in the 2013 court case Hardwick v. Heyward to rule that prohibiting a student from wearing Confederate flag shirt did not violate the First Amendment because there was evidence that the shirt could cause disruption. [17] Exceptions to this are the 2010 court case Defoe v.