enow.com Web Search

  1. Including results for

    defenses to a defamation case

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States defamation law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law

    Defenses to libel that can result in dismissal before trial include the statement being one of opinion rather than fact or being "fair comment and criticism", though neither of these are imperatives on the US constitution. Truth is an absolute defense against defamation in the United States, [1] meaning true statements cannot be defamatory. [2]

  3. Fair comment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_comment

    If "actual malice" cannot be shown, the defense of "fair comment" is then superseded by the broader protection of the failure by the plaintiff to show "actual malice". Each state writes its own laws of defamation, and the laws and previously decided precedents in each state vary. In many states, (including Alabama where the case of Times v.

  4. Defamation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation

    As with any defamation case, truth remains an absolute defence to defamation per se. This means that even if the statement would be considered defamatory per se if false, if the defendant establishes that it is in fact true, an action for defamation per se cannot survive. [ 55 ]

  5. Substantial truth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantial_truth

    This doctrine is applied in matters in which truth is used as an absolute defence to a defamation claim brought against a public figure, but only false statements made with "actual malice" are subject to sanctions. [2] A defendant using truth as a defence in a defamation case is not required to justify every word of the alleged defamatory ...

  6. Giuliani says he can't surrender a Joe DiMaggio jersey in his ...

    www.aol.com/giuliani-says-cant-surrender-joe...

    Rudy Giuliani was in federal court in New York on Thursday for his election-worker defamation case. Lawyers for Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss said Giuliani had yet to surrender key possessions.

  7. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan

    New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restrict the ability of public officials to sue for defamation.

  8. Rudy Giuliani’s lawyers abruptly quit defamation case - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/rudy-giuliani-lawyers-abruptly...

    Rudy Giuliani’s lawyers have abruptly quit representing him in his defamation case after attorneys for the women he defamed accused the disgraced former New York City mayor of hiding property he ...

  9. Judge blasts Rudy Giuliani's 'farcical' excuse for failing to ...

    www.aol.com/news/judge-blasts-rudy-giulianis...

    Rudy Giuliani was hit with a nearly $150 million judgment last year after a judge found him liable for defamation. ... Liman said he regularly presides over cases in which debtors big and small ...