enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karnataka_Scheduled_Castes...

    The Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 [1] (Karnataka Act 2 of 1979) or PTCL is a statute of Karnataka.. This law which was introduced in 1978 is retrospective in nature and is considered an ex post facto law.

  3. Stovin v Wise - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stovin_v_Wise

    This page was last edited on 12 September 2024, at 13:28 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.

  4. Heydon's Case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heydon's_Case

    Heydon's Case (1584) 76 ER 637 is considered a landmark case: it was the first case to use what would come to be called the mischief rule of statutory interpretation.The mischief rule is more flexible than the golden or literal rule, in that the mischief rule requires judges to look over four tasks to ensure that gaps within the law are covered.

  5. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-03-09-amicus.pdf

    %PDF-1.3 %Äåòåë§ó ÐÄÆ 4 0 obj /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream x µš{s · Àÿ¿O ¦®K¦Öù^¼#û¦$Z¦+‘2IÅ“V™ŽÇ•:î¸ÊÄÒø ...

  6. I.C. Golaknath and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anrs. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I.C._Golaknath_and_Ors._v...

    The family filed a petition under Article 32 challenging the 1953 Punjab Act on the ground that it denied them their constitutional rights to acquire and hold property and practice any profession (Articles 19(1)(f) and 19(1)(g)) and to equality before and equal protection of the law (Article 14).

  7. A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._K._Gopalan_v._State_of...

    Gopalan was prohibited from disclosing the grounds under which he was detained because of Section 14 of the Act, which prohibited such disclosure even in a court of law. He claimed that the order detaining him violated Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution and that the provisions of the Act violated Article 22 of the Constitution.

  8. Rule against perpetuities - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_against_perpetuities

    The rule against perpetuities serves a number of purposes. First, English courts have long recognized that allowing owners to attach long-lasting contingencies to their property harms the ability of future generations to freely buy and sell the property, since few people would be willing to buy property that had unresolved issues regarding its ownership hanging over it.

  9. Indian High Courts Act 1861 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_High_Courts_Act_1861

    Each High Court could consist of a chief justice and up to 15 judges. Under §3 of the Act, judges could be selected from barristers (with five years of experience), civil servants (with ten years of experience including three years as a zillah judge), judges of small cause courts or sudder ameen (with five years of experience), or pleaders of lander courts or High Courts (with five years of ...