Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Restatement (Second) of the Law of Contracts is a legal treatise from the second series of the Restatements of the Law, and seeks to inform judges and lawyers about general principles of contract common law. It is one of the best-recognized and frequently cited legal treatises [1] in all of American jurisprudence.
In the United States, the Restatement (Second) of Contracts lists the following criteria to determine whether a specific failure constitutes a material breach: [29] In determining whether a failure to render or to offer performance is material, the following circumstances are significant:
The Restatements of the Law is one of the most respected and well-used sources of secondary authority, covering nearly every area of common law. While considered secondary authority (compare to primary authority), the authoritativeness of the Restatements of the Law is evidenced by their acceptance by courts throughout the United States.
Restatement, Second, Contracts §§153-154; Speckel v Perkins; Mutual mistakes, shared assumptions. Restatement, Second, Contracts §§151-152 and 154; Sherwood v. Walker 66 Mich 568, 33 NW 919 (1887) Nester v Michigan Land & Iron Co; Griffith v Brymer; Wood v Boynton; Firestone & Parson, Inc v Union League of Philadelphia; Everett v Estate of ...
An option contract is a type of contract that protects an offeree from an offeror's ability to revoke their offer to engage in a contract. Under the common law, consideration for the option contract is required as it is still a form of contract, cf. Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 87(1).
Most states have adopted the UCC, which governs transactions in goods. Contracts for services or land, for example, would not be governed by the UCC. The second Restatement of Contracts also provides that when parties have not agreed to an essential term, "a term which is reasonable in the circumstances is supplied by the court." However, it ...
What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Cite this page; Get shortened URL; Download QR code
Section 261 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts does not explicitly define the scope of what is considered impracticable, as it is a fairly subjective and fact-intensive test for the courts. Generally, courts do not consider events such as an increase in price or costs beyond a normal range to allow for discharge of duties on grounds of ...