enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. using setTimeout synchronously in JavaScript - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/4122268

   Calls setTimeout 1st inside of demo then put it into the webApi Stack. // 2. Creates a promise from the sleep function using setTimeout, then resolves after the timeout has been completed; // 3. By then, the first setTimeout will reach its timer and execute from webApi stack. // 4.

3. What is the difference between Asynchronous calls and Callbacks

   stackoverflow.com/questions/36213948

   Asynchronous: Asynchronous calls do not block (or wait) for the API call to return from the server. Execution continues on in your program, and when the call returns from the server, a "callback" function is executed. In Java, C and C#, "callbacks" are usually synchronous (with respect to a "main event loop").

4. How is async with await different from a synchronous call?

   stackoverflow.com/questions/17250047

   To simplify matters, lets consider a simple async method: public async Task MyMethodAsync() {. // code block 1 - code before await. // await stateement. var r = await SomeAwaitableMethodAsync(); // code block 2 - code after await. } When you mark a method with async identifier you tell the compiler to break the method into a state machine and ...

5. are async/await async or synchronous? - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/72799361

   So in short, we speak of asynchronous when, between the time of the currently executing code (the reference point) and the execution of the code we label "asynchronous", there comes a moment the call stack is empty. the await keyword halts the execution of a function until the promise is resolved. I wouldn't call this a "halt".

6. difference between Asynchronous and Synchronous in .net 4.5

   stackoverflow.com/questions/27742698

   Checks of completed awaiters and a state machine are involved. This makes some asynchronous operations take more time than the corresponding synchronous operation. On the other hand, most operations suited for async-await are naturally asynchronous and there is some extra processing involved to make it look and feel synchronous. In these cases ...

7. Is there any reason to use a synchronous XMLHttpRequest?

   stackoverflow.com/questions/2088318

   Synchronous XHRs are useful for saving user data. If you handle the beforeunload event you can upload data to the server as the user closes the page. If this were done using the async option, then the page could close before the request completes. Doing this synchronously ensures the request completes or fails in an expected way.

8. ASP.NET Core : Synchronous operations are disallowed. Call...

   stackoverflow.com/questions/47735133

   I'm not sure what your requirements are or what GetDic() does, but code like the following should absolutely work given GetDic() doesn't do any synchronous IO: public async Task<IActionResult> SanityCheck() { Dictionary<string, string> dic = await GetDic(); return this.Ok(dic); }

9. synchronous and asynchronous loops in javascript

   stackoverflow.com/questions/42173350

   24. If you place asynchronous loops inside a for...loop and want to stop the loop until each operation ends, you must use the async/await syntax like this. var array = [/* some data that will be used async*/] //This loop will wait for each next() to pass the next iteration. for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {.

10. How to make an asynchronous Dart call synchronous?

    stackoverflow.com/questions/28238161

    The only time that you can wrap an async method in a synchronous one is when you don't need to get a return value. For example if you want to disable the save button, save results to the server asynchronously and re-enable the save button when the job is done you can write it like this: Future<bool> save() async {.

11. What's the "right way" to use HttpClient synchronously?

    stackoverflow.com/questions/53529061

    Try the following: var task = Task.Run(() => myHttpClient.GetAsync(someUrl)); task.Wait(); var response = task.Result; Use it only when you cannot use an async method. This method is completely deadlock free as mentioned on the MSDN blog: ASP.Net–Do not use Task .Result in main context.