Ads
related to: compare docsis 3.0 and 3.1walmart.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
ebay.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
DOCSIS 3.1 uses channel bandwidths of up to 192 MHz in the downstream. [15] Upstream: DOCSIS 1.0/1.1 specifies channel widths between 200 kHz and 3.2 MHz. DOCSIS 2.0 & 3.0 specify 6.4 MHz, but can use the earlier, narrower channel widths for backward compatibility. DOCSIS 3.1 uses channel bandwidths of up to 96 MHz in the upstream. Modulation:
DOCSIS 3.0 and lower — 4 Gigabit b/g/n a 2.4 5.0 450 — — — 0 0 0 — — 6.04 FRITZ!Box 6360 Cable Cable DOCSIS 3.0 and lower — 4 Gigabit b/g/n a 2.4 5.0 300 1 USB 2.0 — 2 1 6.5 FRITZ!Box 6430 Cable Cable DOCSIS 3.0 and lower — 4 Gigabit b/g/n 2.4 450 2 USB 2.0 0 2 0 7.30 German version only FRITZ!Box 6810 LTE LTE — 1 Fast b/g/n ...
DOCSIS 1.0 [12] (cable modem) 38/9 Mbit/s: 4.75/1.125 MB/s: 1997 DOCSIS 2.0 [13] (cable modem) 38/27 Mbit/s: 4.75/3.375 MB/s: 2002 VDSL ITU G.993.1: 52 Mbit/s: 7 MB/s: 2001 VDSL2 ITU G.993.2: 100 Mbit/s: 12.5 MB/s: 2006 Uni-DSL: 200 Mbit/s: 25 MB/s: 2006 VDSL2 ITU G.993.2 Amendment 1 (11/15) 300 Mbit/s: 37.5 MB/s: 2015 BPON (fiber optic service ...
In March 2017, SCTE/ISBE society and MoCA consortium began creating a new "standards operational practice" (SCTE 235) to provide MoCA 2.0 with DOCSIS 3.1 interoperability. Interoperability is necessary because both MoCA 2.0 and DOCSIS 3.1 may operate in the frequency range above 1 GHz.
Under DOCSIS 3.0, up to 32 downstream and 8 upstream channels may be bonded. [27] These are typically 6 or 8 MHz wide. DOCSIS 3.1 defines more complicated arrangements involving aggregation at the level of subcarriers and larger notional channels. [28]
The second is the Downstream External PHY Interface (DEPI). The DEPI protocol controls the delivery of DOCSIS frames from the M-CMTS Core to the EQAM devices [20] Some of the challenges that entail an M-CMTS platform are increased complexity in RF combining and an increase in the number of failure points. One of the benefits of an M-CMTS ...
DOCSIS 3.1 Upstream [14] ... A comparison between the two modulation techniques also reveals that the complexity of both algorithms remains approximately the same.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
Ads
related to: compare docsis 3.0 and 3.1walmart.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
ebay.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month