Ads
related to: california state arrest warrant searchcourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- Police Warrant Search
View Police Records
Enter Any Name To Search
- Police Arrest Records
Look Up Detailed Police Records
Enter Name & State To Search
- Criminal History Check
Find Local Police Records
Search County Police Records Online
- Search Police Records
Public Police Records Onliine
County Police Record Search
- Police Warrant Search
reviewpublicrecords.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
freshdiscover.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that police officers arresting a person at his home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but that police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant. [1]
Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [1] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.
Search incident to a lawful arrest, commonly known as search incident to arrest (SITA) or the Chimel rule (from Chimel v.California), is a U.S. legal principle that allows police to perform a warrantless search of an arrested person, and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, in the interest of officer safety, the prevention of escape, and the preservation of evidence.
Officers informed Cardenas that they had a search warrant and would be conducting a strip search, according to the lawsuit Allred brought against the California Correctional Institute, Adventist ...
People v. Diaz, 51 Cal. 4th 84, 244 P.3d 501, 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 105 (Cal. January 3, 2011) was a Supreme Court of California case, which held that police are not required to obtain a warrant to search information contained within a cell phone in a lawful arrest. [1]
Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966), was a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified the application of the Fourth Amendment's protection against warrantless searches and the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination for searches that intrude into the human body.
Ads
related to: california state arrest warrant searchcourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
reviewpublicrecords.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
freshdiscover.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month