Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
As Moore and Mealy machines are both types of finite-state machines, they are equally expressive: either type can be used to parse a regular language.. The difference between Moore machines and Mealy machines is that in the latter, the output of a transition is determined by the combination of current state and current input (as the domain of ), as opposed to just the current state (as the ...
The state diagram for a Mealy machine associates an output value with each transition edge, in contrast to the state diagram for a Moore machine, which associates an output value with each state. When the input and output alphabet are both Σ , one can also associate to a Mealy automata a Helix directed graph [ clarification needed ] ( S × Σ ...
UML state machines have the characteristics of both Mealy machines and Moore machines. They support actions that depend on both the state of the system and the triggering event, as in Mealy machines, as well as entry and exit actions, which are associated with states rather than transitions, as in Moore machines. [citation needed]
For a Mealy machine, input and output are signified on each edge, separated with a slash "/": "1/0" denotes the state change upon encountering the symbol "1" causing the symbol "0" to be output. For a Moore machine the state's output is usually written inside the state's circle, also separated from the state's designator with a slash "/". There ...
UML state machines have the characteristics of both Mealy machines and Moore machines. They support actions that depend on both the state of the system and the triggering event, as in Mealy machines, as well as entry and exit actions, which are associated with states rather than transitions, as in Moore machines. [4]
In the state-transition table, all possible inputs to the finite-state machine are enumerated across the columns of the table, while all possible states are enumerated across the rows. If the machine is in the state S 1 (the first row) and receives an input of 1 (second column), the machine will stay in the state S 1.
The algorithmic state machine (ASM) is a method for designing finite-state machines (FSMs) originally developed by Thomas E. Osborne at the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) since 1960, [1] introduced to and implemented at Hewlett-Packard in 1968, formalized and expanded since 1967 and written about by Christopher R. Clare since 1970.
A Mealy machine can be used as a cryptographic machine. Given an alphabet A, it is said to be possible to process a word from this alphabet into a word from alphabet B if there exists a Mealy machine which does this. Using mathematical notation, M - Mealy machine, -> - to process: thus a tuple (M, ->).