enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mitchell v MNR - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_v_MNR

    Mitchell v MNR, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 911 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on aboriginal rights under section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982.The court held that Mitchell's claim to an aboriginal right to import goods across the Canada–US border was invalid as he was unable to present enough evidence showing that the importation was an integral part of the band's distinctive culture.

  3. NOAAS Mount Mitchell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOAAS_Mount_Mitchell

    Mt. Mitchell also operates two launches, R/V Mt. Augustine and R/V Mt. Shishaldin. For shallow-water surveying, Mt. Augustine is a 32-foot (9.75-meter) Silver Streak cuddy-cabin twin-diesel craft outfitted with a multibeam sidescan sonar mount and laboratory space that Mt. Mitchell launches and retrieves through a Vestdavit system. Mt.

  4. R. J. Mitchell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._J._Mitchell

    The R J Mitchell Primary School at Hornchurch, originally named the Mitchell Junior School when it opened on 2 December 1968, is also named in his honour. [105] Supermarine Spitfires piloted by Commonwealth and European airmen flew from RAF Hornchurch .

  5. Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Iacobucci

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasons_of_the_Supreme...

    R v Smith 2003 SCC 48 [URL] [DESCRIPTION] Arbour J: McLachlin CJ and Gonthier, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel and Deschamps JJ: R v Mitchell 2003 SCC 49 [URL] Sentencing of dangerous and long-term offenders: Arbour J: McLachlin CJ and Gonthier, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel and Deschamps JJ: R v Kelly 2003 SCC 50 [URL]

  6. United States v. Mitchell (1983) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Mitchell...

    United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206 (1983), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the United States is accountable in money damages for alleged breaches of trust in connection with its management of forest resources on allotted lands of the Quinault Reservation.

  7. Wisconsin v. Mitchell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_v._Mitchell

    Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476 (1993), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that enhanced penalties for hate crimes do not violate criminal defendants' First Amendment rights. [1] It was a landmark precedent pertaining to First Amendment free speech arguments for hate crime legislation. [2]

  8. United Public Workers v. Mitchell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Public_Workers_v...

    United Public Workers v. Mitchell , 330 U.S. 75 (1947), is a 4-to-3 ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Hatch Act of 1939 , as amended in 1940, does not violate the First , Fifth , Ninth , or Tenth amendments to U.S. Constitution .

  9. Mitchell v. United States (1999) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_v._United_States...

    Mitchell v. United States , 526 U.S. 314 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case that considered two Fifth Amendment privileges related to a criminal defendant ’s rights against self-incrimination in a Federal District Court .