Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
R v Latimer, [2001] 1 SCR 3 was a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in the controversial case of Robert Latimer, a Saskatchewan farmer convicted of murdering his disabled daughter, Tracy Latimer.
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin L'Heureux-Dubé Gonthier Iacobucci Major Bastarache Binnie Arbour LeBel R. v. Latimer, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 3; 2001 SCC 1 : June 14, 2000 ...
This case caused a national controversy concerning the definition and ethics of euthanasia as well as the rights of people with disabilities, [1] and resulted in two Supreme Court decisions, R. v. Latimer (1997), on section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and later R. v. Latimer (2001), concerning cruel and unusual ...
The section has generated some case law, including the essential case R. v. Smith (1987), in which it was partially defined, and R. v. Latimer (2001), a famous case in which Saskatchewan farmer Robert Latimer protested that his long, mandatory minimum sentence for the murder of his disabled daughter was cruel and unusual. The section states: 12.
In R. v. Latimer (2001), the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed that to charge a jury with respect to the defence of necessity there must be an air of reality for all three aspects of necessity. The court further affirmed that the defence of necessity is not available to a defendant when (1) the killing occurred when there was no imminent danger ...
June 7, 2001 Judicial independence R v Pan; R v Sawyer [2001] 2 S.C.R. 344, 2001 SCC 42 June 29, 2001 Section 7, juries, disclosure Law Society of British Columbia v Mangat [2001] 3 S.C.R. 113, 2001 SCC 67 October 18, 2001 Paramountcy doctrine; practice of law R v Advance Cutting & Coring Ltd [2001] 3 SCR 209, 2001 SCC 70 October 19, 2001
Westchester County Executive George Latimer holds a 17-point lead over Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) in a tense Democratic New York House primary, according to a new poll. A survey by Emerson ...
In R. v. Latimer, 2001 SCC 1, [33] the Supreme Court discussed jury nullification and indicated that it is a duty of the presiding justice to try to prevent it from occurring. Perhaps the most famous cases of jury nullification in Canada were the various trials of Henry Morgentaler , who openly operated a private abortion clinic in violation of ...