Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The state position was that as owned by a Kazakh national the claimant was not eligible for investment protection under the Dutch-Kazakh BIT. This argument was dismissed by the Arbitrage. The Kazakh state then alleged that it didn't nationalize the bank, but it bailed it out (wiping out the shares' value in the process).
An investment policy is required under virtually all investor circumstances, with the exception of individual investors. According to the US Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), for every qualified company retirement plan (e.g., 401[k], profit sharing, pension, 403[b]) there are certain fiduciary responsibilities for managing the plan assets with the care, skill ...
Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 239 U.S. 441 (1915), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that due process protections attach only to administrative activities in which a small number of people are concerned, who are exceptionally affected by the act, in each case upon individual grounds.
“While the Legislature sought to provide additional flexibility for the state’s investment portfolio, ... denounced the governor’s decision. The group, based in Charlotte, ...
Investment controlling deals with such needs and helps to overcome the information gaps within asset management. Investment controlling is an area of activity that is part of the overall controlling process within the asset management and is an important component of the recurring investment decision making process.
Investment decisions are made by investors and investment managers. These decision are made based on the finding of analysis tools based on data available about the companies. [1] Investors commonly perform investment analysis by making use of fundamental analysis, technical analysis and gut feel. Investment decisions are often supported by ...
Jul. 1—The New Mexico State Investment Council invested $250 million in two firms in its most recent meeting. The SIC met on June 25 to go over its investment agenda, which included approving a ...
The decision was based on national security concerns after CFIUS failed to reach a consensus on the deal. Nippon and U.S. Steel subsequently challenged the decision in federal court, arguing that the president's action was politically motivated and lacked a legal basis.