enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: parte simms ukhl classic cut cotton shirts for women

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    The House of Lords allowed the appeal. Lord Steyn gave the leading judgment. Lord Hoffmann agreed with Lord Steyn and said the following. [note 1]Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights.

  3. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union [1995] UKHL 3 is a House of Lords case concerning the awarding of compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme. The case is considered significant in constitutional terms for its ruling on the extent of ministerial prerogative powers.

  4. R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Daly)_v_Secretary_of...

    R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKHL 26 is a UK constitutional law case of the House of Lords case on the rights of a prisoner when his cell is searched by prison officers.

  5. List of landmark judgements of the House of Lords - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark...

    UKHL 1 Claims under the 'loss of a chance' doctrine in medical negligence are actionable only where it is more likely than not (>50% likely) that the defendant's negligence caused the plaintiff to lose the chance of recovery. Caparo Industries Plc. v Dickman: 1990 Pure economic loss in tort. Duty of care. Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers ...

  6. R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Factortame_Ltd)_v...

    The Law Reports: R v Secretary of State for Transport ex parte Factortame Ltd (No. 2) [1991] 1 AC 603; Factortame II. bailii.org: ECJ's 2nd ruling, 25 July 1991; 2nd ECJ decision, official version at eur-lex; Factortame III. ECJ's 3rd ruling, 5 March 1996; Factortame IV. Divisional Court, 31 July 1997; Court of Appeal, 8 April 1998; House of ...

  7. Raffles v Wichelhaus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raffles_v_Wichelhaus

    Raffles v Wichelhaus [1864] EWHC Exch J19, often called "The Peerless" case, is a leading case on mutual mistake in English contract law.The case established that where there is latent ambiguity as to an essential element of the contract, the Court will attempt to find a reasonable interpretation from the context of the agreement before it will void it.

  1. Ads

    related to: parte simms ukhl classic cut cotton shirts for women