Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Trump then appealed the cases to the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals on July 27, 2022, claiming absolute immunity. [288] The Court of Appeals ruled against him on December 1, 2023, allowing the civil suits to proceed. [301] Judge Mehta was scheduled to hear arguments for six more lawsuits related to January 6. [299]
Gov. Josh Shapiro on Sunday said the man killed at the Trump rally, Corey Comperatore, “dove on his family to protect them.” “Corey died a hero,” the governor said. Comperatore, 50, was a ...
On Monday, the Supreme Court issued the final decisions of its term, including the highly anticipated ruling on former President Donald Trump's claims of immunity from criminal prosecution.. From ...
Here’s a transcript of the audio from the shooting and aftermath at the podium with Trump and Secret Service members, starting just after 6 p.m ET Saturday: 18:11:33: Shots are fired. 18.11:34 ...
Trump was transported to Butler Memorial Hospital for examination immediately after the shooting. [151] The Secret Service had already called hospital officials and asked that the hospital be put on lockdown, putting into action an emergency plan that was created for when Trump spoke at another nearby rally in 2020. [152]
Trump's team asked the Supreme Court to reject the expedited timeline and allow the appeals court to consider the case first. [29] [30] On December 22, the Supreme Court denied the special counsel's request, leaving the case to the appeals court. [31] On January 9, 2024, the D.C. Court of Appeals heard arguments in the immunity dispute.
U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley on Tuesday posted video that showed the aftermath of the killing of Trump shooter Thomas Crooks, with law enforcement agents on a rooftop alongside his body.
DeVillier v. Texas, 601 U.S. 285 (2024), was a case that the Supreme Court of the United States decided on April 16, 2024. [1] [2] The case dealt with the Supreme Court's takings clause jurisprudence. Because the case touched on whether or not the 5th Amendment is self-executing, the case had implications for Trump v.