enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/...

    Phrases such as those above present the appearance of support for statements but can deny the reader the opportunity to assess the source of the viewpoint. They may disguise a biased view. Claims about what people say, think, feel, or believe, and what has been shown, demonstrated, or proved should be clearly attributed. [c]

  3. Confirmation bias - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

    Confirmation bias (also confirmatory bias, myside bias, [a] or congeniality bias [2]) is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms or supports one's prior beliefs or values. [3]

  4. Pro forma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro_forma

    Lenders and investors will require such statements to structure or confirm compliance with debt covenants such as debt service reserve coverage and debt to equity ratios. Similarly, when a new corporation is envisioned, its founders will prepare pro forma financial statements for the information of prospective investors.

  5. Social Security: How To Confirm the Validity of ‘New Stimulus ...

    www.aol.com/social-security-confirm-validity...

    The deadline to claim the 2020 credit is May 17, 2024. The deadline to claim the 2021 credit is April 15, 2025. Read Next: Cutting Expenses in Retirement: 6 Stores To Stop Buying From

  6. Glomar response - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glomar_response

    In United States law, the term Glomar response, also known as Glomarization or Glomar denial, [1] means to respond evasively to a question with the phrase "neither confirm nor deny" (NCND). [2] For example, in response to a request for police reports relating to a certain person, the police agency may respond: "We can neither confirm nor deny ...

  7. Argument map - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_map

    Intermediate conclusions or sub-conclusions, where a claim is supported by another claim that is used in turn to support some further claim, i.e. the final conclusion or another intermediate conclusion: In the following diagram, statement 4 is an intermediate conclusion in that it is a conclusion in relation to statement 5 but is a premise in ...

  8. Verificationism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verificationism

    Verificationism, also known as the verification principle or the verifiability criterion of meaning, is a doctrine in philosophy which asserts that a statement is meaningful only if it is either empirically verifiable (can be confirmed through the senses) or a tautology (true by virtue of its own meaning or its own logical form).

  9. Claim (philosophy) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claim_(philosophy)

    A claim is a substantive statement about a thing, such as an idea, event, individual, or belief. Its truth or falsity is open to debate. Its truth or falsity is open to debate. Arguments or beliefs may be offered in support, and criticisms and challenges of affirming contentions may be offered in rebuttal.