Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, 592 U.S (2021), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, dealing with nominal damages to be awarded to individuals whose right to freedom of speech has been suppressed by an entity but subsequently rendered moot due to intervening circumstances.
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, 575 U.S. 768 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding a Muslim American woman, Samantha Elauf, who was refused a job at Abercrombie & Fitch in 2008 because she wore a headscarf, which conflicted with the company's dress code. [1] The Supreme Court of the United States ruled 8–1 in Elauf's favor on ...
8/8 0 0 0 0 0 Associate Justice: Clarence Thomas: George H. W. Bush: October 15, 1991 75% 6/8 0 0 0 1 1 Associate Justice: Samuel Alito: George W. Bush: January 31, 2006 100% 8/8 0 1 0 0 1 Associate Justice: Sonia Sotomayor: Barack Obama: August 6, 2009 100% 8/8 0 0 1 0 1 Associate Justice: Elena Kagan: Barack Obama: August 7, 2010 100% 8/8 1 0 ...
Hollingsworth v. Perry was a series of United States federal court cases that re-legalized same-sex marriage in the state of California. The case began in 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, which found that banning same-sex marriage violates equal protection under the law.
(1) Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1) applies to a claim presented in a second or successive motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255; and (2) Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E) deprives this Court of certiorari jurisdiction over the grant or denial of an authorization by a court of appeals to file a second or successive motion to vacate under 28 ...
Activists rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court before the start of oral arguments in the United States v. Rahimi Second Amendment case in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 7.
The Supreme Court of the United States does not allow cameras in the courtroom when the court is in session, a policy which is the subject of much debate. [1] Although the Court has never allowed cameras in its courtroom, it does make audiotapes of oral arguments and opinions available to the public. [2]
Pereira v. Sessions, Attorney General, no. 17-459, 585 U.S (2018), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding immigration.In an 8-1 majority, the Court reversed a lower court’s decision by ruling that a Notice to Appear which does not inform a noncitizen when and where to appear for a removal proceeding is not valid under 8 U.S. Code § 1229(b) and therefore does not trigger the stop ...