Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Crypto regulations vary across the U.S. from state to state and even between federal agencies, which all have different ways of defining crypto that come with their own tax implications and laws.
The legal status of cryptocurrencies varies substantially from one jurisdiction to another, and is still undefined or changing in many of them. [1] Whereas, in the majority of countries the usage of cryptocurrency isn't in itself illegal, its status and usability as a means of payment (or a commodity) varies, with differing regulatory implications.
While this is not the preferred policy path, checks and balances are working, and this is unlocking pent-up demand for clearly regulated crypto products. Emerging bipartisan support
<i>Yesterday, Congress addressed in two full hearings why it’s time to start taking a closer look at why and how digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, are impacting U.S. marketplaces.</i ...
A former CFTC chairman argues it's time for Congress to allow the agency to take the lead in crypto regulation. Crypto should be regulated by CFTC, not other agencies: Ex-official [Video] Skip to ...
Without Congress, federal regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission have stepped in to take their own enforcement actions against the industry, including the filing of lawsuits ...
Appearing on CoinDesk TV, Summer K. Mersinger discussed why the need to regulate crypto will require working closely with other agencies. Regulating Crypto Not a ‘One-Agency Solution,’ CFTC ...
Congress must enact a clear framework for the sensible regulation of crypto, as it is the most important American financial innovation in decades, but the SEC's interpretation of the 1934 ...