Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 2015, the process for declaring matrimonial nullity was amended by the matrimonial nullity trial reforms of Pope Francis, the broadest reforms to matrimonial nullity law in 300 years. [6] Prior to the reforms, a declaration of nullity could only be effective if it had been so declared by two tribunals at different levels of jurisdiction.
Michelle McQuigg, a Virginia county clerk and intervening defendant in the case, had asked the Fourth Circuit to stay its mandate in the case. On August 13, 2014, Judge Floyd, with the concurrence of Judge Gregory, denied the intervening defendant's motion on a vote of 2–1, with Judge Niemeyer voting to grant the motion.
The legal term in the 2009 settlement is "with prejudice." [35] Giuffre's legal team argued that the terms of the settlement were irrelevant to her case against Andrew. [34] On January 4, 2022 lawyers for both sides argued in court whether the case should go ahead. [36]
About a year ago, Johnson was acquitted in the case after a four-week jury trial began in September 2022, according to the lawsuit filed Oct. 19 on his behalf against the Arlington Police ...
Since 1975, Australian law provides only for void marriages. Before 1975, there were both void and voidable marriages. Today, under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth.) a decree of nullity can only be made if a marriage is void. [22] A marriage is void if: [23] [24] [25] one or both of the parties were already married at the time (i.e. bigamy)
In the canon law of the Catholic Church, a declaration of nullity, (commonly called an annulment and less commonly a decree of nullity) [1] is authoritative judgment on the part of an ecclesiastical tribunal juridically establishing the fact that a marriage was invalidly contracted or, less frequently, a judgment juridically establishing the fact that an ordination was invalidly conferred.
Because the Virginia State Bar is licensed by the Virginia Supreme Court to regulate the profession in the state, policies promulgated by it and its subsidiaries are "state action" and are thus subject to the Parker v. Brown [6] state action exemption from federal antitrust law.
This category contains articles regarding case law decided by the courts of Virginia. Pages in category "Virginia state case law" The following 17 pages are in this category, out of 17 total.