Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Collierville is the second oldest town in Shelby County. The original town of Collierville was laid out in 1836 and named after entrepreneur Jesse R. Collier, who bought land and advertised it as "The Town of Collier"; the town was incorporated in 1850 under the mayorship of Richard Ramsey. [10] [11]
This tax may be imposed on real estate or personal property. The tax is nearly always computed as the fair market value of the property, multiplied by an assessment ratio, multiplied by a tax rate, and is generally an obligation of the owner of the property. Values are determined by local officials, and may be disputed by property owners.
Three-eighths of Hall income tax payments are distributed to the local government of the municipality or county where the taxpayer resides. There are no restrictions on how local governments use the money. This distribution arrangement may be related to the genesis of the Hall tax as a property tax on an intangible property. [18]
Collierville is slated to see a variety of developments take shape in 2024, bringing new homes, retail, hotels and much more to the town. Here are 9 Collierville projects bringing homes, retail ...
Collierville: Shelby County: 51,324 29.41 sq mi (76.2 km 2) Private act 1807 West: Collinwood: Wayne County: 982 2.82 sq mi (7.3 km 2) Uniform manager-commission 1921 Middle Columbia: Maury County: 41,690 31.56 sq mi (81.7 km 2) Private act 1817 Middle: Cookeville: Putnam County: 34,842 32.85 sq mi (85.1 km 2) Private act 1903 Middle ...
Roughly bounded by Highland, Goodlett, the former Southern railroad line, and the rear property lines of Marion and parcels on Park 35°05′49″N 89°55′57″W / 35.0969°N 89.9325°W / 35.0969; -89.9325 ( Normal Station Historic
Thompson Machinery wants to move its regional headquarters from Whitehaven to Collierville and create new high-paying jobs in the process. Collierville OKs tax break for company looking to ...
The court ultimately asserted that any harm is a generalized consequence of real estate economics rather than a specific result of the suburb's regulations. Therefore, since the elevated housing costs could not be directly attributed to a certain exclusionary policy, the court ruled in favor of the suburb's ordinance.