Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Invitational rhetoric is a theory of rhetoric developed by Sonja K. Foss and Cindy L. Griffin in 1995. [1]Invitational rhetoric is defined as “an invitation to understanding as a means to create a relationship rooted in equality, immanent value, and self-determination.” [1] The theory challenges the traditional definition of rhetoric as persuasion—the effort to change others—because ...
Adianoeta – a phrase carrying two meanings: an obvious meaning and a second, more subtle and ingenious one (more commonly known as double entendre). Alliteration – the use of a series of two or more words beginning with the same letter. Amphiboly – a sentence that may be interpreted in more than one way due to ambiguous structure.
The four modes of persuasion are present in many more ways than most might think. They can be seen in advertisements on social media, on television, in flyers, and even on billboards on the side of the road. [9] This type of persuasion can be seen in a simple conversation with family members or friends.
Invitational education (IE) is a theory of educational practice that emphasizes the importance of internal knowledge in relation to external connections to the outside world and educational system. A key feature is that a student's positive self-concept , leading to their productivity , be developed through the school environment.
Proactivity is about taking responsibility for one's reaction to one's own experiences, taking the initiative to respond positively and improve the situation. Covey postulates, in a discussion of the work of psychiatrist Viktor Frankl, that between stimulus and response lies a person's ability to choose how to react, and that nothing can hurt a person without the person's consent.
After one of his 14-week courses, he was approached by publisher Leon Shimkin of the publishing house Simon & Schuster. [8] Shimkin urged Carnegie to write a book, but he was not initially persuaded. Shimkin then hired a stenographer to type up what he heard in one of Carnegie's long lectures and presented the transcript to Carnegie, [ 9 ] who ...
Make your contribution as informative as is required (for the current purposes of the exchange). Do not make your contribution more informative than is required. In his book, Grice uses the following analogy for this maxim: "If you are assisting me to mend a car, I expect your contribution to be neither more nor less than is required.
This skill includes opening to new information, taking more than one perspective, and understanding personal ways of interpreting messages and situations. [ 2 ] [ 7 ] Tolerance for ambiguity: the ability to maintain focus in situations that are not clear rather than becoming anxious and to methodically determine the best approach as the ...