enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Tort insurance: what is full vs limited tort car insurance? - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/tort-insurance-full-vs...

    The limited vs. full tort terminology is used primarily in the three no-fault states previously mentioned: Kentucky, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. ... In these cases, ... New Jersey tort. In New ...

  3. Full tort and limited tort automobile insurance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_tort_and_limited_tort...

    Both full tort and limited tort coverage only apply in situations where the driver or passengers have been injured in an accident that is not the driver's fault. The victim then has the option of bringing charges against the at-fault driver to sue in court for unpaid medical bills, property damage, loss of income, pain, and suffering.

  4. No-fault insurance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-fault_insurance

    In three U.S. states – Kentucky, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania – policyholders are permitted to choose between traditional tort and no-fault recovery regimes. Under such systems, known as "choice" or "optional" no-fault, policyholders must select between "full tort” and "limited tort" (no-fault) options at the time the policy is written or ...

  5. Judiciary of New Jersey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_New_Jersey

    The Judiciary of New Jersey comprises the New Jersey Supreme Court as the state supreme court and many lower courts.. New Jersey's judiciary is unusual in that it still separates cases at law from those in equity, like its neighbor Delaware but unlike most other U.S. states; however, unlike Delaware, the courts of law and equity are formally "divisions" of a single unified lower court of ...

  6. United States v. Carroll Towing Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Carroll...

    United States v. Carroll Towing Co., 159 F.2d 169 (2d.Cir. 1947), [1] is a decision from the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals that proposed a test to determine the standard of care for the tort of negligence.

  7. Green v. America Online, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_v._America_Online,_Inc.

    The case began at the U.S. District Court for New Jersey, which ruled against Green.He then appealed to the Third Circuit.The circuit court affirmed the lower court ruling, reasoning that Green may have been able to file a tort claim against the John Does for both damage to his computer and emotional distress, but could not do so against AOL.

  8. Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reckitt_&_Colman_Products...

    Reckitt & Colman Ltd v Borden Inc 1 All ER 873, – also known as the Jif Lemon case – is a leading decision of the House of Lords on the tort of passing off. The Court reaffirmed the three part test (reputation and goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage) in order to establish a claim of passing off. Background per Slade LJ: Reckitt, sold lemon juice under the name "Jif Lemon" which came in ...

  9. Capri stock craters 45% after judge blocks $8.5 billion ...

    www.aol.com/finance/capri-stock-craters-nearly...

    Capri Holdings (), the parent company of Michael Kors and Jimmy Choo, saw shares plunge around 47% in early trading on Friday after a US judge blocked its pending $8.5 billion acquisition by Coach ...