Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
According to the certified results from the New York Board of Elections, the proposal passed with 56.99% in support, 34.23% opposed, and 8.78% of votes blank. [1] According to The New York Times, although the proposal faced right-wing opposition, it succeeded in several counties where voters otherwise voted for Donald Trump, the Republican ...
New Yorkers voted on Tuesday to expand protections for pregnant people and safeguard abortion care from future attacks. Voters successfully passed Proposition 1, which changes the state’s Equal ...
NEW YORK (PIX11) – An amendment to the New York State Constitution that protects abortion rights passed on Tuesday. Proposition 1, also known as the Equal Rights Amendment, adds protections for ...
Rochester, N.Y. (WROC-TV) — Among the yard signs sporting the names of various candidates are a few telling folks to vote for or against “Prop 1”. That proposition is on this year’s ballot ...
Citizen-initiated amendment: Proposition 140, would require ranked-choice voting to be used in general elections, and, contradicting Proposition 133, create nonpartisan blanket primaries. [ 52 ] Legislatively-referred statute : Proposition 311 , establishes a $20 fee on every conviction for a criminal offense, which would go to a $250,000 ...
Abortion in New York is legal, although abortions after the 24th week of pregnancy require a physician's approval. Abortion was legalized up to the 24th week of pregnancy in New York in 1970, three years before it was legalized for the entire United States with the Supreme Court's decision in Roe v.
The vast majority of voters support Prop 1, and AAPI New Yorkers – myself included – know that protecting our rights and freedoms, including the right to abortion, is at stake this election ...
Alaska, Hawaii, California, and New York were the only four states that made abortion legal between 1967 and 1970 that did not require a reason to request an abortion. [4] California amended its abortion law in 1967 to address the disconnect between legal and medical justifications for therapeutic exceptions.