Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Family Justice Center was completed in 2016, consolidating court operations from six different facilities in a single building. [13] The doctrine of corporate personhood in US law is commonly traced to the 1886 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, which started in this court.
This local electoral calendar for 2025 lists the subnational elections scheduled to be held in 2025. Referendums, recall and retention elections, and national by-elections (special elections) are also included. Specific dates are given where these are known.
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... This national electoral calendar for 2024 lists the national/federal ... This page was last edited on 28 January 2025, ...
Santa Clara County Superior Court: Santa Clara: San Jose (5), Morgan Hill, Palo Alto (criminal), Santa Clara (traffic) [83] Santa Cruz County Superior Court: Santa Cruz: Santa Cruz, Watsonville [84] Shasta County Superior Court: Shasta: Redding (2) [85] Sierra County Superior Court: Sierra: Downieville, Portola (shared with Plumas) [86] [72 ...
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California (in case citations, N.D. Cal.) is the federal United States district court whose jurisdiction comprises the following counties of California: Alameda, Contra Costa, Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Marin, Mendocino, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Edward John Davila (born June 21, 1952) is an American lawyer who serves as a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. He was previously a California state court judge of the Santa Clara County Superior Court from 2001 to 2011.
County of Santa Clara v. California First Amendment Coalition , 170 Cal. App. 4th 1301 (2009), was a case before the California Courts of Appeal dealing with the ability of a local California agency to limit the disclosure of, or require license agreements for, public records and data requested under the California Public Records Act (CPRA).