enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. 135 film - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/135_film

   135 film. The film is 35 mm (1.4 in) wide. Each image is 24×36 mm in the most common "small film" format (sometimes called "double-frame" for its relationship to the "single-frame" 35 mm movie format or full frame after the introduction of 135 sized digital sensors; confusingly, "full frame" was also used to describe the full gate of the movie format half the size).

3. Full-frame DSLR - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full-frame_DSLR

   The first full-frame DSLR cameras were developed in Japan from around 2000 to 2002: the MZ-D by Pentax, [26] the N Digital by Contax's Japanese R6D team, [27] and the EOS-1Ds by Canon. [28] Nikon has designated its full frame cameras as FX format and its smaller sensor interchangeable-lens camera formats as DX and CX.

4. 35 mm movie film - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/35_mm_movie_film

   35 mm film is a film gauge used in filmmaking, and the film standard. [1] In motion pictures that record on film, 35 mm is the most commonly used gauge. The name of the gauge is not a direct measurement, and refers to the nominal width of the 35 mm format photographic film, which consists of strips 1.377 ± 0.001 inches (34.976 ± 0.025 mm) wide.

5. AOL.com - News, Sports, Weather, Entertainment, Local & Lifestyle

   www.aol.com

   AOL latest headlines, entertainment, sports, articles for business, health and world news.

6. Image sensor format - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_sensor_format

   For example, the Nikon D3 and D700 cameras' nominally full-frame sensors actually measure 36 × 23.9 mm, slightly smaller than a 36 × 24 mm frame of 35 mm film. As another example, the Pentax K200D 's sensor (made by Sony ) measures 23.5 × 15.7 mm, while the contemporaneous K20D 's sensor (made by Samsung ) measures 23.4 × 15.6 mm.

7. Zeiss ZX1 - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeiss_ZX1

   The ZX1 received reviews with mixed conclusions. There was strong agreement that its lens and sensor produced particularly high-quality images, but that its minimal physical controls and design choices made in priority of its visual design compromised its usability - a particular point of criticism was the camera's viewfinder: its rubber eye cup, in contrast with those of most enthusiast-level ...