enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telemarketing_and_Consumer...

    The Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (Pub. L. 103–297) is a federal law in the United States aimed at protecting consumers from telemarketing deception and abuse. The act is enforced by the Federal Trade Commission .

  3. If you purchased these potato chips in the past 8 years, you ...

    www.aol.com/news/purchased-potato-chips-past-8...

    Customers who purchased Deep River brand potato chips labeled “Non-GMO Ingredients” may be eligible for a cash payment from a class action settlement.

  4. Roberts warns against ignoring Supreme Court rulings as ...

    www.aol.com/roberts-warns-against-ignoring...

    Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts slammed what he described as “dangerous” talk by some officials about ignoring federal court rulings, using an annual report weeks before President ...

  5. Identify legitimate AOL websites, requests, and communications

    help.aol.com/articles/identify-legitimate-aol...

    Best practices • Don't enable the "use less secure apps" feature. • Don't reply to any SMS request asking for a verification code. • Don't respond to unsolicited emails or requests to send money.

  6. Van Buren v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Buren_v._United_States

    Van Buren v. United States, 593 U.S. 374 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and its definition of "exceeds authorized access" in relation to one intentionally accessing a computer system they have authorization to access. In June 2021, the Supreme Court ruled in a 6–3 opinion ...

  7. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Atlantic_Corp._v._Twombly

    Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving antitrust law and civil procedure.Authored by Justice David Souter, it established that parallel conduct, absent evidence of agreement, is insufficient to sustain an antitrust action under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

  8. We learned too late how to fight scams that target the ...

    www.aol.com/news/learned-too-fight-scams-target...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  9. Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anticybersquatting...

    The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d),(passed as part of Pub. L. 106–113 (text)) is a U.S. law enacted in 1999 that established a cause of action for registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name confusingly similar to, or dilutive of, a trademark or personal name.