Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The fact that the average city had crime rates similar to the state in contrast to the lower median rates indicates the presence of outliers with high crime rates. Indeed, the 66th percentile for violent crime rates was 3.69 crimes per 1,000 people, still not as high as the average crime rate among cities (the 33rd percentile was 1.81).
The following table of United States cities by crime rate is based on Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) statistics from 2019 for the 100 most populous cities in America that have reported data to the FBI UCR system. [1] The population numbers are based on U.S. Census estimates for the year end.
Violent crime rate per 100k population by state (2023) [1] This is a list of U.S. states and territories by violent crime rate. It is typically expressed in units of incidents per 100,000 individuals per year; thus, a violent crime rate of 300 (per 100,000 inhabitants) in a population of 100,000 would mean 300 incidents of violent crime per year in that entire population, or 0.3% out of the total.
A report shows that from 2010 to 2020, Glendale, Pasadena and South Pasadena had large disparities between the rates of arrest for Black and Latino populations versus those of their white and ...
Beginning in 1984 with a fire in a South Pasadena hardware store and continuing into the early 1990s, now-former Glendale Fire Captain and Arson Investigator John Leonard Orr committed a series of arson fires that claimed four lives, and caused damage in the millions of dollars. He was convicted on federal arson charges in 1992, and on state ...
South Pasadena police unveiled what the city says is the first all-electric police fleet in the country, with 10 Tesla Model Ys and 10 Model 3s.
The increase started in 2020, when California ranked 16th in the nation for violent crime and the San Joaquin Valley had the highest rate of violence in the state — 640 violent incidents per ...
Crime rates per capita might also be biased by population size depending on the crime type. [6] This misrepresentation occurs because rates per capita assume that crime increases at the same pace as the number of people in an area. [7] When this linear assumption does not hold, rates per capita still have population effects.