Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
However, Wikipedia cannot guarantee the validity of the information found here. The content of any given article may recently have been changed, vandalized, or altered by someone whose opinion does not correspond with the state of knowledge in the relevant fields. Note that most other encyclopedias and reference works also have disclaimers.
Many articles contain frank discussion of controversial topics. Some subjects that are discussed have criminal applications in some jurisdictions. Others contain information on dangerous or otherwise risky activities (see Wikipedia:General disclaimer and Wikipedia:Risk disclaimer). Wikipedia contains spoilers.
This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories.
No original research – Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position not clearly advanced by the sources.
A disclaimer in a Wikipedia article is a statement or visual template that editors may attempt to insert as a warning to readers. While ideas like this have been continually proposed , the consensus is that disclaimers do not belong in encyclopedia articles and should be deleted.
Note that some such organizations will go to great length to cloak their purpose, and attempt to assume the mantle of non-partisan research organizations. Supermarket tabloids, gossip columns, paparazzi , etc. Reason: Frequently untrustworthy and/or inaccurate; often contain articles which are obviously false (such as stories of three-headed ...
Wikipedia:Content disclaimer – Wikipedia contains content you may find objectionable; it also contains spoilers; Wikipedia:Edit war – At any given time, a Wikipedia article may be involved in an "edit war". Wikipedia:General disclaimer; Wikipedia:Legal disclaimer – Wikipedia does not give legal opinions
[f] For example, a review article that analyzes research papers in a field is a secondary source for the research. [g] Whether a source is primary or secondary depends on context. A book by a military historian about the Second World War might be a secondary source about the war, but where it includes details of the author's own war experiences ...