Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Yes. Wikipedia considers each Wikipedia article to be an individual document. Moreover, for the purposes of creating derivative works of individual Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia considers a direct link-back to a particular Wikipedia article as being in full compliance with the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 4.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA), provided your work is also licensed under CC ...
Wikipedia:Citation templates for templates used to format article references and citations; Wikipedia:Requested templates, to request creation of a template. Category:Wikipedia templates; Special:ExpandTemplates, expands all templates recursively; Use this form to search in the Template: or Template_talk: namespaces. See Help:Searching for more ...
A user warning for editors who create discussion forks in good faith. Template parameters [Edit template data] Parameter Description Type Status Additional text 2 Adds additional text at the end of the message, replacing "Thank you." Content suggested header header Adds a header. If set to "yes", creates the heading "Creating discussions" Line suggested icon icon Replaces the default icon File ...
These 50 printable pumpkin carving templates are ready to inspire you. On each image, click "save image as" and save the JPEGs to your computer desktop. From there, you can print them!
Mirrors and forks of Wikipedia are publications that mirror (copy exactly) or fork (copy, but change parts of the material of) Wikipedia.Many correctly follow the licensing terms; however, many others fail – accidentally or intentionally – to place the notice required by these terms.
A point of view (POV) fork is a content fork deliberately created to avoid a neutral point of view (including undue weight), often to avoid or highlight negative or positive viewpoints or facts. All POV forks are undesirable on Wikipedia, as they avoid consensus building, which violates one of our most important policies.
Finally, when two templates are very similar (or an old-style template and a newer Lua module are, and the template does not already rely on the module), and they are kept un-merged for a reason, it is not helpful to fork their options – especially what parameters are supported and what their names are – without a very good reason to do so ...
David A. Wheeler notes [9] four possible outcomes of a fork, with examples: The death of the fork. This is by far the most common case. It is easy to declare a fork, but considerable effort to continue independent development and support. A re-merging of the fork (e.g., egcs becoming "blessed" as the new version of GNU Compiler Collection.)