Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Army's Force management model [3]: diagram on p.559 begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current army to bear on the situation. [2]
The Military Decision Making Process [1] (MDMP [2] [3]) is a United States Army seven-step [4] process for military decision-making in both tactical and garrison environments. [1] It is indelibly linked to Troop Leading Procedures and Operations orders .
The ethics version of the Army game Moral Combat will provide Soldiers with a fun, entertaining experience, further ethical awareness, and intends to stimulate and evolve the moral working self as well as provide a data capture mechanism to support ethics research and moral character development.
The Potter Box is a model for making ethical decisions, developed by Ralph B. Potter, Jr., professor of social ethics emeritus at Harvard Divinity School. [1] It is commonly used by communication ethics scholars. According to this model, moral thinking should be a systematic process and how we come to decisions must be based in some reasoning.
The Code of the U.S. Fighting Force is a code of conduct that is an ethics guide and a United States Department of Defense directive consisting of six articles to members of the United States Armed Forces, addressing how they should act in combat when they must evade capture, resist while a prisoner or escape from the enemy.
The Combat Estimate was introduced by the British Army in 2001, [3] although the military estimate or appreciation process is used widely by militaries around the world. [4] It was developed to simplify and speedup the planning process at Battlegroup (BG) level. [ 5 ]
The intelligence cycle is an idealized model of how intelligence is processed in civilian and military intelligence agencies, and law enforcement organizations.It is a closed path consisting of repeating nodes, which (if followed) will result in finished intelligence.
HARDMAN III was a major development effort of the Army Research Institute's (ARI) System Research Laboratory. The contract that supported the work was let in a three-phase development process. [8] HARDMAN III was government-owned and consisted of a set of automated aids to assist analysts in conducting MANPRINT analyses.