Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The following journals used result-blind peer review or pre-accepted articles: The European Journal of Parapsychology, under Martin Johnson (who proposed a version of Registered Reports in 1974), [113] began accepting papers based on submitted designs and then publishing them, from 1976 to 1993, and published 25 RRs total [98]
academic and scholarly journals (all types); open access publications, peer-reviewed titles; popular magazines, newspapers, newsletters; annuals, continuations, conference proceedings; trade publications, consumer magazines, newsletters and bulletins; limited selection of membership directories, comic books, puzzle and game books; titles that ...
The article is not peer reviewed. All articles that are plausibly connected to the journal's subject are accepted – as long as the payment has been received. The main job of the journal's editor, once the author's payment has been received, is to post the article online.
Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work . [1] It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are used to maintain quality standards, improve performance, and provide credibility.
They may present original research or review the research of others. Many undergo a process of peer review before publication. Watch two short videos on traditional peer review and a comparison to open peer review. Books and monographs: longer academic or popular works. Textbooks: an instructional or educational manual covering a particular ...
What links here; Upload file; Special pages; Printable version; Page information; Get shortened URL; Download QR code
This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...
Questionable sources should be used only as sources for material on themselves, such as in articles about themselves; see below. They are not suitable sources for contentious claims about others. Predatory open access journals are considered questionable due to the absence of quality control in the peer-review process.